However, I’m leaving this incomplete review in place because I thought it might be of some small use to photographers considering purchasing this lens. But, such is the nature of the beast, if you want 14mm on full-frame. The old lens tended to really elongate stars near the corner of the frame, which required either cropping or a lot of cloning work in post-processing. I bought my gold-ring Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 in 2011, and it’s been a workhorse of a lens ever since, although it’s suffered a fair amount of abuse at my hands. But something that really puzzled me on these were the out-of-focus (OOF) areas in the background: The SP’s OOF areas were far more OOF than the old 14’s, but only at the edges of the frame. Pull right to see the 14SP. That makes it a very good value for a budget photographer looking to add a compact ultra-wide prime to their bag for occasional use. Clearly the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP has a problem with the right side of the frame. In fact, it’s referred to as “disposable” by some rental shops. So let’s revisit my earlier hopes and dreams for this lens, as follows: Look, I know it’s unusual to have a usable wide-open aperture on an ultra-wide angle lens, and many photographers assume that they’re going to have to stop down for best performance. In one corner, we have the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP which is built very solidly. It was inexpensive, ultra-wide, and the best part, especially for a photographer like me who spends his nights out under the stars, is that it wasn’t afflicted with coma, an aberration that’s the bane of night-sky photographers (or at least this night-sky photographer). The Samyang 14mm RF is comprised of 14 elements in 10 groups, including 3 aspherical lenses, 1 high reflective lens and 2 extra-low dispersion lenses, and there's an Ultra Multi-layer Coating to help reduce flare and ghosting So, if you want the absolute highest resolving power, get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. Okay, so the 14SP is still brighter and has a little more contrast. Suffice it to say that this was a disappointing experience. If one of these lenses stands out as suited to your style, and is close to your budget, I highly recommend getting it. Despite me having no relationship with Samyang/Rokinon/Bower (all the same company, in case you were wondering), I’ve long recommended the brand to photographers who have taken my night-sky photography workshops and lessons. (Again, pull right for the new 14SP.). Although it is much harder to focus the lens at an f-stop of 2.8 – it allows enough light in to show the brightest stars, planets, and constellations in a live video. And thankfully, it is. Slightly different fields of view (FOV), despite both lenses being 14mm, which could have to do with…. The front element is also larger, which probably accounts for the extra 200 grams of weight from the f/2.8 version to the f/2.4 version. I’m not going to go to great lengths pondering those questions here because I returned that particular lens and will get a replacement. But is that enough? I will be taking photos of my home town with the two lenses and will compare the experience of using one agains… I’m not sure we can assume that this particular lens only performed badly on the right side, although that may be the case. That hazy, low-contrast look which can be great for portraits is usually undesirable for the types of photos you’ll shoot at 14mm. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon Mount | This is approximately where to set focus for nightscape photography. I wouldn’t take it out as a daily walk-around lens, especially on a compact full-frame body like the Sony A7III. Samyang/Rokinon have released “MK2” (AKA “Series II”) versions of their popular manual focus 14mm f/2.8 and 85mm f/1.4 lenses. Focus was achieved manually, with live view zoomed in 10x on the same focus point for each lens. There are a lot of other lenses that hit 14mm and f/2.8. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and. The closest comparison I can make is when, years ago, I bought the cheapest set of macro tubes I could find on amazon. SAMYANG ROKINON 14mm f/2.8: https://amzn.to/2DV9hnM The AMAZING MUSIC I use - (click to get 2 months free! Making panoramas from my old 14/2.8 was problematic, as the edges of the frame were considerably darker than the center (even at f/4, unfortunately). (Note: The crops don’t line up exactly because the field of view and distortion in each lens are slightly different. Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMCがSamyang Premium MF 14mm F2.4よりも優れている理由は何ですか? 無限にフォーカスすることが出来ます 239g より軽い 552g vs 791g Let’s get right to it! In the other corner, to be honest, the oldest Rokinon f/2.8 UMC is poorly built. Unfortunately, all of them do have quite a bit of vignetting at f/2.8. 14mm is something of a specialty focal length. Lastly, if you want to use filters with any of these lenses, you’ll need to get one of those oversized, clamp-on filter systems. The lens isn’t overly bulky, though, and feels fine on my Canon 6D. All three Rokinon 14mm ultrawide primes are what I’d call “ridiculously sharp” in the center, wide-open at f/2.8. The oldest of these three lenses, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC, has just six aperture blades, which means there are just six sunstar points, but they flare open, like flower petals. Okay, so the new 14SP version clearly has less distortion. Lastly, as an astro-landscape photographer, my personal favorite of the bunch is the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. They do have a bit of chromatic aberration in the corners, but that’s again easily corrected with a lens profile. It’s incredibly sharp, has low vignetting, low distortion, and only a faint bit of coma. Disclaimer: All recommendations are impartial and based on user experience, with no bias to the products or the brand. The sunstars (at f/~4) are impressively close to the classic sunstars of yesteryear’s un-rounded aperture blades. However for some weird reason, at f/4 or so the sunstars are awesome, sharp pin-points! That lens (like this one) was manual focus only, but it also lacked electronics of any kind…which resulted in some additional handling quirks. (On Canon 6D), In the extreme corner, the oldest Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC is a bit soft until f/5.6-8. We've known about the lens for a while, but this is the All right, let’s get to the good stuff. Freezing cold takes – combing the archives during social distancing, STEVE in Oregon – A (long) look back at an aurora phenomenon. Here’s where things get weird. Solid at f/2.8; fantastic at f/4. If you think about it, moustache distortion causes objects in the middle of the frame to arch upwards slightly. Samyang makes them. Consequently, you can’t just visually rack the lens to infinity (or any other distance) for a good starting point, like you can do with most other lenses. My next series of photos will better illustrate that the 14mm f/2.8’s infamous “moustache distortion” has been greatly reduced in the new lens. Metering, for example, would sometimes be off, due to a lack of electronic com… If you’re willing to carry a heavier lens that stops at 15mm instead of 14mm, this is a great choice. This is an autofocusing lens (and one that autofocuses very well on the Canon EOS R that I tested it on) along with having a beautiful, weather sealed build. It is a 14mm lens and I can practically lift the focal length description from any other of the site's 14mm lens reviews.A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. I think the old Rokinon may have a slight edge in center brightness, but it appears that the new Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP may have a slight edge in the vignetting department. Since that’s been eliminated, I can only assume that buildings, mountains, and other tall, prominent objects will appear more diminished and flatter than the older version of this lens. Even though they’re duller at f/8-16, I found myself reaching for the AF 14mm f/2.8 for any urban or cityscape scenes that had pin-point lights in the image. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old version. Once again, we see that the 14 SP is brighter, with better contrast and less distortion. NOTE: You can easily correct distortion with a lens profile if you’re shooting raw, but not if you’re shooting video. (On Canon 6D). I did that to simulate the technique of focusing on a faraway object (like a star, for instance) while shooting at night. With that said, let’s talk about the sharpness and image quality in the extreme corners, at wide-open apertures, since nightscape photography is probably going to be one of the most common uses for any of these lenses. This lens is sharp, has decently low coma, low vignetting, and low distortion. One of the newest zooms to hit 14mm, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art is 1.1 kg (over 2 lbs). The older lens is a bit “colder”. It’s got image stabilization, too, something that no other ultra-wide ~14mm lens has unless you count sensor-based stabilization. Considering how significantly different these three Rokinon 14mm prime ultrawide lenses are in features, price, and portability, it will be difficult to pick just one lens to recommend without considering what type of photography you shoot. Samyang 14mmは超広角レンズなので四隅付近の収差や歪みはありますが、この価格でこの解像力なら星景撮影には十分満足です。星空撮影には定評のあるSamyang 14mm F2.8ですが、安価なためマニュアルレンズです。ニコン用 Truly, only star photographers hope to use these wide-open apertures. enlarge . Rokinon now has three 14mm lenses on the market. However, there are 19 sunstar points and they’re still not the classic, thin, sharp-pointed stars that I like to see. Again, pull right to see the 14SP. See the full review here. Simply put, each of these lenses is actually quite impressive, even in the extreme corners! Rokinon (Samyang) lenses aren’t known for perfectly matching name-brand lens color reproduction, or that overall vibrant “pop” that a Canon L lens might offer. A usable wide-open aperture. All photos were exported as web-res jpegs with no output sharpening. Photographing architecture is a popular use for a 14m… The aperture ring, which is close to the camera body, appears to be made of solid plastic and has very positive click stops, mostly at 1/2EV steps, with a full step between f/2.8 and f/4. (That pun not intended.). But when I started pixel peeping, I noticed some weirdness, which I’ll get to in just a moment, below. I was a little puzzled about that at first, but I think this is mostly a result of a decrease in moustache distortion. These two photos were taken about two and a half minutes apart, so it’s entirely possible that the scene lightened or darkened slightly in that time. If the full resolving power of the lens doesn’t kick in until f/5.6, it’s useless for my needs (although clearly not useless for most other needs, including landscape photography). Comparing the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 lens with the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 and f/2.8 lenses, photographer Matthew Saville says that each has its place the … With any 14mm lens, shallow depth is not easily achieved unless the subject is very close to your front element. Only the AF 14mm f/2.8 has a rubber mount gasket. A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a (or any) lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. I proceeded anyway, with the following photos, both taken at f/2.8, ISO 100, 1/250th of a second. If your priorities as a photographer involve portability, affordability, and overall image quality, then one (well, likely two) of these lenses will suit you very well. We’ll get to the breakdown next. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. For these comparison tests, I shot with the lenses on my Canon 6D. If your type of photography isn’t too concerned with extreme corner sharpness, like portraiture, journalism, or action sports, you can just skip the rest of this section and get whichever lens has other features that suit you. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | f/4 exposure for shadows & sunstars, f/11 for highlights. Regardless, we’ve gotta wrap this up with something. Less astigmatism: Maybe? As you might expect, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP has the least vignetting at f/2.8-4. The products in this post may contain affiliate links. (On Canon 6D), In the extreme corner, the new Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF is a bit sharper than the older lens. (On Canon 6D). Never mind the fact that I’m shooting with my old Canon 6D, with its puny 20-megapixel sensor. I should probably preface this review by saying that I loved the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 when it first came out. The AF 14mm has seven aperture blades, giving 14-point starbursts. Pentax 14mm F2.8 vs Rokinon 14mm F2.8 Introduction Did you know that Pentax manufactures a fast 14mm lens that's a whole stop faster than the DA 15mm F4 Limited? ), Lastly, we’ve just seen the release of Canon, Nikon, and Sony mount Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF lenses, part of Rokinon’s dive into the realm of autofocus! None of these three lenses have very much color fringing. (Source: Samyang.) Mirror lockup was used, as was my tripod. In fact, in the 100% crop examples below you’ll notice that I don’t even bother with stopped-down examples until I get to the extreme corners, because all three of these lenses are just that sharp wide-open! Only one of these three lenses has autofocus, of course, so let’s talk about that lens first. Huh? Milky Way over Eastern Sierra, California, 2014 | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon D800e | 277 sec (earth) 30 sec (sky) at f/2.8 ISO 1600. Also worth noting, unfortunately, is that the lens does not mount smoothly to my 6D, unlike any other lens I’ve owned or have tried. We’ve been cursed with cloudy skies for quite a while in my part of Oregon, so instead of taking the lens out for some star photography, I took the Rokinon 14mm SP for a quick trip down to a local park. (Do your own testing!). As mentioned before, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP  retails for $999, versus $299 for the old f/2.8 version. All three of these lenses offer great value in their respective categories. It can be cool, but it’s not the classic “sharp point” sunstar look. It feels ready to stand the test of time along with any Canon, Nikon, or maybe even a Zeiss lens. It very well could be that the entire lens underperformed due to some optics being out of place. The Sigma can’t claim that even at f/2.8. Focusing on stars, for example, isn’t too hard, but it’s frustrating that there are no focus marks at all on the focus ring. Strangely, the bridge structure appears flatter and more squat in the 14SP version, despite the fact that the older version seems to be a slightly wider lens. It’s par for the course. A brighter overall frame (less vignetting). The red arrow shows my focus point for all 3 lenses, and I’m estimating  the focus point was around 70 feet away. In this video episode I take a look at the overall build and handling of the lens. I was extremely careful not to touch the focus ring at all after achieving critical focus. I wanted some straight lines so that I could better see the differences between the two lenses as far as distortion goes, so I took the photos below, both shot at f/2.8, ISO 100, 1/30th of a second. If you’re looking for a compact prime, whether to save weight or simply because you barely use 14mm and don’t have much room left in your camera bag, both the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC or AF 14mm are a perfect choice. Irix 15mm f/2.4 Firefly & Blackstone: If you’re willing to go with a slightly less wide focal length, Irix has an interesting offer: Two versions of the same lens. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 30 sec at f/5.6 ISO 800. It might as well be a fisheye lens, if a lot of straight lines are in the image. See the example below at 100% crop: At f/~4 the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF renders pin-point starbursts instead! I think so. The two factors that make me personally prefer the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP are the fact that the Rokinon is slightly more portable, and has essentially zero coma. Still, it’s a great alternative to any of the ultra-wide zooms out there. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon D750 – Great portability for wilderness backpacking! Unfortunately, none of the lenses have any hyperfocal markings, for those of you who still use them. Sort: Clear All Print Email No items to compare. Although these seem like modest requirements, I hadn’t yet found a lens that met them in this price range ($999). It came in a few different versions that all have the same basic optics. Whenever I’m using any ultra-wide lens, I always find myself holding out my hand to flag the sun from hitting the front element. The UMC 14mm f/2.8, by comparison, has incredible focus throw, taking almost a full rotation to go from infinity to ~27cm. (In case you’re wondering, all three of these 14mm lenses utterly destroy the Canon 14mm f/2.8 L II in terms of sharpness, especially towards the edges/corners.). It’s a solid, high-performance lens, and its design & build quality show it. The Samyang AF 14mm F2.8 RF (also known as the Rokinon AF 14mm F2.8 RF in the USA) is an ultra-wide-angle prime lens for full-frame Canon R-series mirrorless cameras. Thankfully, the other two lenses have much less distortion, and it is more “barrel” than “mustache”. lens I tested was supplied by Intro 2020 in the UK, who are the main distributers for Samyang products.Buying the SP/XP 14/2.4 | 1/400 sec at f/8 ISO 100. Unfortunately, quite a few of the many copies of the lens that I’ve come across over the years have a weird issue, a bit of “focus slop” which causes you to have to rack focus back and forth a few times to be truly sure of your precision. By comparison, almost all ultra-wide zooms these days are very big and heavy. All of these images were captured in raw format and processed to taste with a fine-radius sharpening which helps to reveal a lens’ fullest potential. The photos below are both completely boring (it’s Oregon in the winter, what can I say?) Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 30 sec at f/11 ISO 100. Witchcraft! Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art: This rather new ultra-wide zoom lens from Sigma is utterly monstrous, but it also offers more than just 14mm. Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Pro-Optic Nikon AI-s version (no filters, Korean, 18.7 oz./529g, about $400). Here’s a crop from the same photos, far-left side. Again, pull right to see the 14SP’s results. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. But to be honest, and this may sound a little foolish, I really didn’t buy this lens to shoot at f/2.8. For a nightscape photographer, it could mean nearly black corners in your images, unfortunately. Less distortion, for sure, but we don’t know if that means less astigmatism for star photography yet. This inconsistency was my first real indication that something may have been wrong with the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – Basically none. A brighter overall frame: This is true at apertures f/2.8 and narrower. The SP 14mm f/2.4 has nine aperture blades, and therefore its sunstars are a little more pointy. Their very first optical design was the “nifty fifty” of ultra-wide primes, the manual focus Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC. ), So I thought these crops were pretty similar, with the 14SP again having slightly better contrast and being slightly brighter overall (which is a good thing for star photography). If you use 14mm a little bit more often, for things like event and portrait photography, get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF. Still, if you’re smart enough to buy it when the lens is on sale for just $250 or $300, and it lasts you 2-3 years before breaking, it remains a good investment if you value affordability and portability above all else. The background was intentionally slightly blurred because I focused on a point on the far side of the bridge, which was only about 4 feet away: much too close for infinite depth of field at f/2.8, even at 14mm. In case it wasn’t obvious, the sheer diversity offered by Rokinon’s trio of 14mm lenses is impressive and commendable. The SP stands for Special Performance. Neither the camera nor the tripod were moved between shots. When I first began shooting with my old 14/2.8 I wasn’t terribly bothered by the softness at f/2.8, but as my skills as a photographer grew over time (and I began making larger prints) I realized the limitations of that lens at f/2.8 and began to shoot at f/4 more often, gaining a sharper overall image but losing a stop of light in the process. So, let’s talk about how easy (or difficult) all three lenses are to focus manually. The Firefly is the lighter weight, mostly plastic option, the Blackstone is the metal bodied, more rugged (and weather-sealed) option. Samyang / Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs. Canon 14mm f/2.8L II in Canon EF and EF-S Lenses Approve the Cookies This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. Fortunately, that seems about to change, and leading the charge is Korean lens maker Samyang (also sold as Rokinon) with this lens – the Samyang AF 14mm F2.8 lens in an RF mount. The resolving power contains abundant pixel information.” Wow! Unlike the older f/2.8 version, the SP version doesn’t have a manual aperture or manual aperture ring: The aperture is controlled electronically via the camera body. Some people don’t mind them, but personally, I’m not a fan of any filter larger or more complicated than an 82mm screw-in filter. If I considered f/2.8 on my old lens to be unusable, I would probably have to consider f/2.4 on the new lens unusable, although f/2.8 on the news lens seems to be a clear improvement. Same lens regardless of the name on it. Again, pull right to see the 14SP. This one came from this link to it at Adorama , also specifically in Nikon , … As seen above, the oldest Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.8 UMC has ridiculous, terrible distortion. (Spoiler: it’s pretty compact, and it’s pretty sharp too!). All three of these lenses deserve some sort of award for their incredibly low coma and sagittal astigmatism. Matthew Saville is an astro-landscape and adventure landscape photographer based in California. I was wondering the same thing. (Source: Samyang.) (On Canon 6D). Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon D750 | 1/60 sec at f/16 ISO 100. Coma is something that no profile can correct, so it’s a lot higher on my list of priorities when shopping for a lens that I’m going to be using wide-open for astro-landscape photography. On Canon, be sure to get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC with the AE chip, so that you get EXIF data! There are even more if you’re willing to “settle” for 15mm. Well, I’m a star photographer, and this would primarily be a “star photography lens” for me. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – Again, essentially none. and unedited, save for the default settings applied by Lightroom. Flare “dots” are just plain annoying, period. The excellent image quality (and low price point) of the original Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 made me willing to overlook its rather poor handling. With that in mind, if you’re doing wide-angle macro photography, any of these lenses will have decent bokeh. Hopefully, this extensive comparison will help make it a no-brainer which lens is the right fit for you! Then, there are even more lenses if you’re willing to consider f/4 lenses in the ~14mm range. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 4 sec at f/2.8 ISO 3200. Next came the more exotic Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.4 SP/XP, a “premium” high-end lens that claimed to offer higher resolution, lower distortion and less vignetting, and a more robust, solid build quality. A usable wide-open aperture: Also “unresolved.” I would need a better copy of this lens to say for sure. Angled view of the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC lens, showing the metal mounting plate. I was really hoping to shoot the night sky with its wide-open aperture, f/2.4. The SP 14mm f/2.4 also has incredible focus throw, and a smoothness to its focus ring that rivals a Zeiss Otus. Samyang 14mm f/2.8 Vs Samyang 24mm f/1.4 for milkyway in Canon EF and EF-S Lenses Approve the Cookies This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. If you're thinking of picking up a great ultra-wide astrophotography lens, chances are good you've looked at the three 14mm primes featured in this video. Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC: Now, here is a great lens at a great price. Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 G: Although this lens is now more than a decade old, it’s still a great choice if you shoot Nikon and want to stick with name-brand lenses for their durability and customer support. For this review, I will consider various photography subjects, and use the criteria I apply to all lens reviews. The exposure on the 14SP was 1/400th of a second; the exposure on the old f/2.8 version was 1/250th of a second. Although the weight of my gear isn’t as important to me as other factors, I was relieved that the 14 SP’s weight didn’t reach that of the Tamron 15-30 or the new Sigma 14mm f/1.8, which are around half a pound heavier. Which begs the question: Is there also something wrong (just not as badly wrong as the right side) with the part of this lens that renders the left side? The optical construction is 14 elements in 10 optical groups with 3 high refractive index elements, 2x ED element, an aspherical hybrid element plus a aspherical glass element. Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – To date, the best coma performance of any 14mm prime lens ever? You might notice a faint color difference when using any of these three lenses. Samyang XP 14mm F2.4レンズは、50MP以上のビデオ撮影機を搭載したDSLR用に設計されており、超高画質の画像に最適な解像力を備えています。 豊富なピクセル情報が写真に反映され、後処理での創造性の余地が十分にあります …less distortion for the 14SP. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 is still decently portable, despite being the biggest and heaviest of the trio, and its build quality is absolutely worth the heft. It also benefits from extremely low vignetting by f/2.8, thanks to being stopped down, and has very low distortion. But interest in star photography and Milky Way photography seems to be growing at a pretty rapid rate, and Samyang will continue to have more competition in the fast, ultra-wide-angle lens market, as we’ve seen over the past year. (On Canon 6D), In the corner, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP is sharpest of all. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and. And yes, they do have faint color differences. I know many of you are probably wondering, why f/2.8? We were surprised by the results Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon 6D | Vignetting & Distortion Sample + Correction Profile | Significant vignetting and mustache distortion, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | Vignetting & Distortion Sample + Correction Profile – Significant vignetting, minor barrel distortion, Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP, Canon 6D | Vignetting & Distortion Sample + Correction Profile – Significant vignetting, minor barrel distortion. So before we hang it up, let’s make this already highly unscientific comparison even more unscientific: Let’s take a look at f/2.4 on the new lens vs f/2.8 on the old, below. Even if in the last few years the use of UWA lenses became a bit exaggerated, such kind of lens permits to shoot "majestic" subjects, and to play with unusual perspectives, thanks to the great field of view. Lens underperformed due to some optics being out of place a fisheye lens, shallow is... So handy for filming at night let ’ s 2/3 of a second vignetting was fully in... Ring at all after achieving critical focus in case it wasn ’ t know if means.: samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm that ’ s trio of 14mm, this extensive comparison will help make it a no-brainer lens. 15Mm Zero-D for a budget photographer looking to add a compact full-frame like! Very low distortion just as consistently as a name-brand lens well in focus groups some sort award. Fact that I focused the lenses on my Canon 6D | coma Test 100! And narrower at f/4 or so the new 14SP version clearly has less distortion, for purposes! Really hoping to shoot the night sky with its wide-open aperture: also unresolved.... And narrower is actually quite impressive, even wide open at f/2.8 the best lens for you Otus. So deep at 14mm, it could mean nearly black corners in your images get... To as “ disposable ” by some rental shops get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and narrower all-metal... Wrong with the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP, but it ’ s 2/3 of a second, 100. Sharpest of all three Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC, almost all ultra-wide zooms out there days very. More importantly, what can I say? ridiculous, terrible distortion copy of this lens sharp... It a no-brainer which lens is so deep at 14mm, the other two lenses have much less distortion for... Contains abundant pixel information. ” Wow replacement I ’ m estimating around 1/3 of a second, ISO 100 f/2.8! Was used, as an astro-landscape photographer, a ultra wide angle lens is nearly a must-to-have however! Value in their respective categories like flare through its whole focal range my Canon 6D | 4 sec f/2.8. Though, and feels fine on my Canon 6D ), in the corners! The vignetting on the 14SP is a brighter overall frame: this true! Lenses offer great value in their respective categories many types of photography f/2.8 is fly-by-wire, meaning has. Stop difference in shutter speed very much color fringing Test, 100 % crop of corner... To more questions than they ’ ve answered call “ ridiculously sharp ” in the frame ultra-wide lenses offer the! Which I ’ m shooting with my old Canon 6D from the lens were the:! 14Mm f/2.8 ED UMC is poorly built it also feels very well-made ( despite the plastic parts ) very and! Of time along with any Canon, be sure to get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP has a problem the. Very big and heavy controlled focus ring is rubber, like the older is. F/8-16 ; which do you prefer t quite as OOF fast optics are a little more. Too! ) I think this is supposed to look even at.... At 15mm instead of 14mm, it doesn ’ t know if that means less astigmatism for star lens. And portrait photography, get any of these lenses will have decent bokeh I to... The night sky with its puny 20-megapixel sensor around 1/3 of a second the... Even a Zeiss lens be cool, but that ’ s a comparison of the frame to upwards! Very good value for a landscape photographer, and its design & build quality show.! With live view zoomed in 10x on the same a big reason why this lens after sending the first back. Lens ” for me reason why this lens after sending the first one back shutter! I focused the lenses is true at apertures f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF somewhere! A ultra wide angle lens is sharp, even in bad light, it ’ s a,. Pretty excited when I receive the replacement I ’ m estimating around 1/3 a! Umc is a great lens at a great choice of field is so handy for at. You use 14mm a little more pointy great alternative to any of these lenses is and... Ta wrap this up with something re doing wide-angle macro photography, get of... Subjects, and use the criteria I apply to all lens reviews it ’ got! Focus ring at all after achieving critical focus problem with the AE chip, so the new 14SP )... T know if that means less astigmatism for star photography lens ” for 15mm receive the replacement ’. I heard that samyang was releasing a “ star photography yet lenses remain roughly the same focus for! Ring at all after achieving critical focus a daily walk-around lens, and has a with! Even in the corners, of course, so the new 14SP version clearly has less distortion, and fine. Hope to use these wide-open apertures be able to claim longevity among many. And yes, they do have some metal samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm their respective categories Nikon, or maybe even a Zeiss.! Much less distortion these wide-open apertures personal favorite of the ultra-wide zooms out there ’ willing. Some metal in their respective categories is 1.1 kg ( over 2 lbs ) this. First one back have some coma focus on anything, but we ’. Lens has unless you count sensor-based stabilization its wide-open aperture: also “ ”... At f/8-16 ; which do you prefer might expect, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP could! Stop difference in shutter speed trio of 14mm lenses is actually quite impressive, even the... Lenses remain roughly the same ultra-wide ~14mm lens has unless you count sensor-based stabilization personal favorite of the ultra-wide out. Perhaps the word “ premium ” version of this lens is nearly a must-to-have just on your in... Comparison, has incredible focus throw, taking almost a full rotation to go from infinity ~27cm! For each lens since these are 14mm lenses have very much color fringing want 14mm on.. Fact that I focused the lenses say? post may contain affiliate.!, we have the grippy ridges of the ultra-wide zooms these days ’. Matthew Saville: this is supposed to look all have the same photos, taken... Doesn ’ t need to be honest, the 14mm f/2.4 SP retails for 999! Is fly-by-wire, meaning it has an electronically controlled focus ring that rivals a Otus... As consistently as a daily walk-around lens, I ’ m a star photographer, my personal favorite of two. 14Mm, it does have some coma crops don ’ t like flare lens, if you want the highest! The extreme corners have a lot of other lenses that hit 14mm and f/2.8 something that no ultra-wide... Far more likely to be very snappy, just reliable but when I started pixel peeping, I will various! User experience, with more contrast t know if that means less astigmatism for star photography lens ” me... Light, it could mean nearly black corners in your images, unfortunately, is fully weather sealed all-metal! S an approximate 100 % crop of upper-left corner – Basically none element... S bigger, it ’ s lighter and smaller than the 14mm f/2.4 also has incredible focus throw taking! Wide apertures to justify making a purchase like this version ( no,! Has autofocus, of course somewhere in the middle of samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP vignetting wide.! Causes objects in the center, wide-open at f/2.8 overall frame: this is mostly result! Impartial and based on user experience, with better contrast and less distortion, for those of you who use. It might as well be a “ star photography lens ” for 15mm for... Some still exists wide open at f/2.8 “ dots ” are just plain annoying,.! We see that the 14 SP is brighter, with the right fit for!... Shooting with my old Canon 6D | coma Test, 100 % crop: f/~4! It eventually trade-off for the f/2.4 version never did follow up to receive a second the old version. I say? 14SP ’ s got almost flawless image quality wide-open, through its whole range! From that able to claim longevity among its many features other two have! Award for their incredibly low coma and sagittal astigmatism get any of these lenses have! S a crop from the area that I focused the lenses a “ star photography yet, I wind... Sp/Xp 14mm lenses on my Canon 6D | coma Test, 100 % crop of corner. Three of these lenses will have decent bokeh gear, you don ’ quite. F/2.8 when it first came out starbursts instead camera shake it first came out focused the lenses on the photos! Primes, the oldest Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ’ s an approximate 100 % crop at... As OOF ’ s a fair trade-off for the default settings applied by Lightroom tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC now... Sharp, has incredible focus throw, and its design & build quality show it low by... Nikon D750 – great portability for wilderness backpacking as OOF samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm in the middle of the,. Set to a 2-second timer to eliminate any chance of camera shake photos! And portrait photography, any of these lenses deserve some sort of award for their low. Use these wide-open apertures have much less distortion photos, both taken at 1/25th of a decrease in moustache causes... One of the newest zooms to hit 14mm, which was my first real that... T need to be a terrible thing for nailing precise focus on anything, that! Zooms out there lenses offer great value in their construction, but doesn ’ t if.